Author |
Message |
Kola
Moderator Username: Kola
Post Number: 1463 Registered: 02-2005
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 - 12:37 am: |
|
FROM THE WASHINGTON POST: ________ Essay ONE STRANGE CASE The Real Michael Jackson Remains at Large By Libby Copeland Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, June 14, 2005; Page C01 Just like that? Oh yeah, just like that. After the decision of a 12-person jury in Santa Maria, Calif., Michael Jackson is now free to be everything that makes us so uneasy, free to resume sleepovers with whomever he likes at his earliest convenience. (And he must be exhausted.) For years we've longed for someone to tell us what the heck's going with Michael Jackson. So we had this trial, in which seemingly every piece of his private life was unearthed and examined like the ruins of Pompeii, and we peeked inside the locked closet off Jackson's bathroom and found . . . a Macaulay Culkin doll, still in its original packaging. Jackson was found not guilty on all 10 counts yesterday. What's it all mean? The decision is rendered but we're no wiser. Pieces of the mystery break off and float to the top: Michael Jackson's bedroom is filled with child mannequins. Michael Jackson was once hand-fed by Liz Taylor. Michael Jackson may or may not wear tighty-whities, may or may not climb trees for inspiration or sleep with his simian friends, who may or may not dirty his room when they refuse to wear diapers. An acquittal doesn't clear his name; it only muddies the waters. Three years ago it might have seemed impossible that Michael Jackson could seem any more freakish, but then came the trial. What now? Move to Europe, Michael. They still love you in Europe. "People say he looks weird," Deborah Dannelly, president of the Michael Jackson Fan Club, said during the trial. "I've been very close to Michael, and I don't think he looks weird." This is actually completely wrong. If the past few months have proved anything, it's that Jackson is even weirder up close than he is from afar. In Santa Maria, we saw him day in and day out -- our most sustained glimpse since he disappeared down the rabbit hole of fame and eccentricity decades ago. The closer you got, the more he didn't make sense. Up close, that face looks as if it's made from puzzle pieces that weren't meant to fit together. What took place on the central California coast was essentially a conversation about what happens when a particular combination of wealth and celebrity festers and goes bad. Here was a man of such excess, it seemed, social conventions didn't apply. He could share a bed with children if he wanted to. Star-struck parents loaned their kids out just to be near him. He paid them in jewelry and, later, in settled lawsuits. Remember that scene in the Martin Bashir documentary -- the one that started this whole mess -- when Jackson spent an estimated $1 million in a single shopping trip? He ran around, pointing at everything he liked. There was nothing it seemed that he couldn't buy. We didn't like that. (Of course, the goings-on among the throngs of media and fans off Miller Avenue in Santa Maria were also a lesson in excess. When a Jackson fan gets his own spokesman, as happened in recent days, we can all agree the world has gone horribly wrong.) Jackson was what kept us looking, not at the details of the trial, which were far too confusing. To follow a trial, you need a clear timeline, not this mess. When exactly did the alleged molestations take place? Observers were never sure. And there was no sense of good and evil, no sympathetic character to root for. Nearly everyone was dirty, or at the very least, possessed of questionable motives. There were Jackson's former employees with their petty thievings and their tabloid deals. There was the prosecutor, Tom Sneddon, who was accused of pursuing a 12-year vendetta against Jackson and whose disgust for the pop star's pornography seemed matched only by his desire to keep showing the jury more of it. There was the accuser's mother, who cried without tears and begged the jury, "Please don't judge me!" the way she must've seen a soap actor do. At one point, apropos of nothing, she peered toward the back of the courtroom and addressed reporters, her hand over her heart to signal "You guys are basically good guys," she said. And there was Jackson, of course, with his geisha act -- the pale, eerie painted mask, the mincing affectations. During a conversation with the court artist, he held his hands together shyly and grinned, childlike, shrugging his shoulders. When he whispered to attorneys, he put his hand to one side of his face, as if he were sharing secrets on the playground. Only Jackson would use an arraignment last year as an excuse to entertain, climbing on top of his SUV and dancing before a crowd of cheering fans -- as if he didn't understand the gravity of what he was facing or realize this was a bad reason to be in the public eye. He is a boy star who learned to love the spotlight for any reason; he is Norma Desmond, perpetually ready for his close-up. Each trip he took to the hospital (at least four during the trial) seemed more contrived than the last. When is Jackson not performing? Maybe when he speaks in the "very normal voice, very male voice" described by the accuser's mother, if you believe her testimony about that. Maybe not even then. There was a sense of being trapped in the trial, trapped by the inexorable dribble of dirty details. We could not turn away. We thought: This must be the way Jackson's lion felt in its cage at Neverland ranch, when he supposedly threw stones at the poor thing to make it roar. What were we supposed to think of him? This is a man who loves symbols that don't mean anything. He wears armbands, medallions and charms that hang from his vest. He used to wear a single glove. Maybe these things mean something to him, but they only confuse us. He is a black man who looks like a white woman, or maybe an Asian woman, or maybe an alien. He is skeletal and wears makeup and talks in a falsetto. He had the world's goodwill in the palm of his hand and he shaped himself into a curio, a Diane Arbus photograph. According to biographer J. Randy Taraborrelli, Jackson made up that story about sleeping in the hyperbaric chamber -- remember that one? -- and leaked it to the media. "Michael has long had an interest in us thinking he's weird," says Seth Clark Silberman, a lecturer at Yale and a Jackson junkie who last year organized a scholarly conference on the singer. Silberman says the pop star knows we find celebrity "even more fascinating if we think there's something lurid behind it." During his closing argument, defense attorney Thomas Mesereau Jr. seemed to allude to this: "Does he look like the kind of person who is even capable of masterminding this kind of criminal conspiracy?" Jackson toys with gender and sexuality, so those, too, ran through the trial. We wondered how a man so effete and exotic could have an ordinary sex life. Some historians argue our culture is particularly nervous about sex abuse right now -- that the concern that developed as women entered the workforce in the '70s and blossomed during the day-care abuse scandals of the '80s never went away. So it's fitting that the latest Jackson scandal be about the sanctity of childhood. He prodded this anxiety over and over in different ways, dangling his baby, "Blanket," over that balcony in Germany. He chose Peter Pan as his inspiration, but at some point he must have discovered that J.M. Barrie, who wrote the fairy tale, was -- some suggested -- a little too interested in children. In the Bashir documentary, he declared on camera that he shared a bed with children. In the 1983 video for his hit "Thriller," just before turning into a werewolf, Jackson tells his date: "I'm not like other guys." You can argue about intention, and what's conscious and what's subconscious and all that. But on some level, Jackson wanted us to wonder. And so it all made sense when this trial happened, and there was a sense of inevitability to the whole thing. Jackson was taunting us. He'd trampled too many sacred cows. The notion of him as a child molester gave us a schema to understand him. It fit so well into what we knew of his life, how he lost his childhood to hard work, how he seems naive and stunted at 12. Ah, we thought when he was charged, he molests little boys. Under the spectral mask and the coral lipstick, we figured, he really was a monster. (For a lot of people, by the way, this is a most unsatisfying horror movie in which the monster escapes at the end. Now the specter of a sequel hangs over us.) And at the same time, we couldn't imagine it ending any other way. The vision of Jackson in prison was simply incongruous. It couldn't happen. Could the delicate one stand the strain? Who would hold his umbrella during daily exercise? So he makes the trip home in his black SUV, back up Figueroa Mountain Road. And we head home too, wondering if we'll have to return to this place, or someplace like it. We take one more drive past the strip malls along Broadway for old times' sake. Past the inn with the stale-smelling lobby and the bar with the mechanical bull. Hit the highway and head south, past the sign for Buellton, "home of split pea soup," toward Los Angeles, land of the living. We do briefly wonder, whither Tom Sneddon? His past 12 years have been about making Jackson pay and he has utterly failed. He is on the brink of retirement. What's his life been about? What does he do now? And then we decide we don't really care. We only want to look at Michael Jackson. The pop star himself has made sure of it.
|
Africanqueen
Regular Poster Username: Africanqueen
Post Number: 48 Registered: 02-2005
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 - 02:52 am: |
|
Hi Kola! How are you doing? This is Nyibol! I thought of you when I watched the news earlier about Michael being charged not guilty so I decided to stop by. I knew he would not be guilty since the boy lied over and over again.. and even worst his mother trained him to lie and it was proven. I guess in my sense Michael's appearance and his weirdness would have nothing to do with what he was in court for. As for sleeping with children...fathers sleep with their children and I would look at Michael being the only father that kid probably had. I still feel bad for him though because he's a big embarassment in the black community. A man needs to stand up for himself and he really never does that because he hated the black man inside of him. I guess we'd just have to wait and see him speak on nightline or something, lol. Well I have to run, it's late. God bless you, I will talk to you soon! |
Kola
Moderator Username: Kola
Post Number: 1465 Registered: 02-2005
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 - 04:40 am: |
|
Hi Nyibol. I did not believe that Michael was guilty. I just hope he stays away from kids from now on. I did not write this article. It's from the WASHINGTON POST. YES---we need to chat, beloved sister. I love you so much and I think of you A LOT. Kola
|
Chrishayden
"Cyniquian" Level Poster Username: Chrishayden
Post Number: 1212 Registered: 03-2004
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 - 10:08 am: |
|
He is a pedophile. He will do it again. But the next time he will know he needs to shut the little boy up. |
Yvettep
"Cyniquian" Level Poster Username: Yvettep
Post Number: 448 Registered: 01-2005
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 - 11:07 am: |
|
But Kola, why should you hope that "he stays away from kids from now on" if you also think that he was not guilty? Was it you who expressed that he was guilty in the past, with other boys, but not this time? If so, do you think, then, that he is somehow "reformed"? I have stated this again and again: Pedophiles do not "magically" change themselves--not through willpower or "being taught a lesson" or prayer. Not necessarily, even, by castration as some have suggested needs to happen in this case. (I have also stated that I believe no penile penetration took place--Unfortunately that is all many people can imagine when they think "molestation.") This is about compulsion, power. Possibly about reinacting things that were done to him. It is not mainly about "sex." But whatever. Once again, our community will turn away from issues we need to discuss (rape, domestic violence, child abuse) and instead celebrate that another one of our icons escaped the Evil White Man. There are many many places around the globe where traffic in young boys is easier. It will be very easy for someone with MJ's resources to engage in this kind of "sex tourism" as it is called, thus avoiding another domestic scandal. And just think: he won't even need to spend thousands of dollars on a little Indonesian boy... |
Cynnique Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 - 12:58 pm: |
|
I, too, have repeatedly reminded that pedophilia is an incurable affliction; it has also been theorized that it is not an acquired preference but an innate one, having something to do with the way the brain is wired, and it is triggered by exposure to youngsters, and that it is an example of deviant behavior which is not limited to men. Women can be disagnosed with it, too. What Michael needs to do is to find a him cute little gay guy who is over 18 but could pass for 12, and take him on as a companion. Then what goes on between them will not be illegal. MJ has to figure out creative ways to satisfy his compulsion. He could even get him a blow-up doll who looked like a young boy and this would allow him to go "all the way." |
Abm
"Cyniquian" Level Poster Username: Abm
Post Number: 3359 Registered: 04-2004
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 - 01:07 pm: |
|
‘Vette, The problem with your perspective here is there appear scant evidence that Mike flouted any laws and there seem few if any LEGAL prohibitions for what we KNOW Mike did. Simply: If we don’t want grown men playing and sleeping in bed with other people children, we should make law stating such and be done with it. Otherwise, we’re left squabbling over the questionable/debatable intent/effect of otherwise LEGAL events. And before you get all condemnatory of Black foks, remember: It was a WHITE jury that exonerated him. So blame THEM. |
Abm
"Cyniquian" Level Poster Username: Abm
Post Number: 3360 Registered: 04-2004
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 - 01:09 pm: |
|
Cynique, WOW! I guess if Mike had consulted with you awhile back he might have saved himself millions in settlement and legals fees. |
Kola
Moderator Username: Kola
Post Number: 1469 Registered: 02-2005
Rating: Votes: 1 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 - 01:37 pm: |
|
But Kola, why should you hope that "he stays away from kids from now on" if you also think that he was not guilty? ____ I think that Michael Jackson, is a CHILD himself. I think his upbringing as a star, his violent/abusive father and his weak enabling mother has seriously damaged him to the point where he doesn't see the world as it is. I also know what it's like to relate better to animals and children than to adults. I do not believe that he is a child molester. I COULD BE WRONG and I HAVE DOUBTS....but after knowing so many child molesters, my intuition never seems to peg him that way. I want him to stay away from children, because he's setting himself up to be destroyed. I also believe that he's a WHITE SUPREMIST---like O.J. Simpson and Jaime Foxx.
|
Yvettep
"Cyniquian" Level Poster Username: Yvettep
Post Number: 450 Registered: 01-2005
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 - 01:42 pm: |
|
***brushing hands, yet again*** |
Abm
"Cyniquian" Level Poster Username: Abm
Post Number: 3368 Registered: 04-2004
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 - 02:19 pm: |
|
'Vette, I've already confessed to having a bias for Michael Jackson. It's just one of those things that flout my reasoning. I don't know. It's kinda 'emotional'. And I think Kola has it too (though she might deny it). So, yeah, "brushing hand" is probably the best thing for you to do here. |
|