data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81b7/c81b7fe684e88a337d0fa4bbb664cfdd3299bfa9" alt="Top of page" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a284/0a28408e8580ea676556f9a5fb78f163f2b0da2f" alt="Previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d84ac/d84ac54b5587aab7fbe549d4fc545db73048bc28" alt="Next message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0412/b04126240bfbabcfa0ace0466523b74a93b4fdb1" alt="Link to this message"
Emanuel Regular Poster Username: Emanuel
Post Number: 384 Registered: 03-2004
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Friday, October 19, 2007 - 01:34 pm: |
|
I'm seeking opinions and professional expertise for an article. Can you please share your opinions of the strategy of trying to get a book deal by first self-publishing, selling 5000 or so books, and then seeking a traditional deal? I know there are many success stories about this strategy in the news. However, we rarely hear about the folks who don't sell many self-published books and what their next steps are. Is this strategy smarter than seeking a literary agent or tradional publisher from the start and settling for nothing less? Is it more difficult for someone who may have self-published, say, ten books and sold less than a thousand of each to get a traditional deal? Please post your opinions here but also shoot me an e-mail at emanuelcarpenter@yahoo.com and include your real name if it's okay to quote you for the article. Thanks, Emanuel Carpenter |