Supreme Court to Decide Legality of C... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Email This Page

  AddThis Social Bookmark Button

AALBC.com's Thumper's Corner Discussion Board » Culture, Race & Economy - Archive 2007 » Supreme Court to Decide Legality of Crack-Powder Cocaine Sentencing Disparity « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Yukio
AALBC .com Platinum Poster
Username: Yukio

Post Number: 2412
Registered: 01-2004

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 09:17 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

by Shavar Jeffries


The Supreme Court decided this week to consider the legality of distinctions in federal law concerning the punishment for drug offenses involving the possession or distribution of powder cocaine and those involving crack. Federal law punishes the possession of 5 grams of crack cocaine at the same level as it does the distribution of 500 grams of powder cocaine. So not only does the law codify a 100:1 distinction concerning the amount of drugs at issue, it punishes the possession of crack at the same level as the distribution of powder. Distribution of course is generally a much more serious crime than possession. To the extent socially cognizable harms are associated with drug use, those harms are multiplied in the context of distributive drug offenses. As such, federal and state law consistently penalize distribution offenses more severely than possession offenses.

The disparity in federal punishment between crack and powder cocaine is thus breathtaking both in quantity and quality. Even assuming that crack is more addictive -- and thus more harmful -- than powder, there isn't an empirical justification for a 100:1 differential. And the disparity is even more faulty given that it equates crack possession with powder distribution. Taken together, the disparity suggests that the sale of large quantities of powder to untold numbers of buyers cause equivalent social harms as the possession, by one person, of crack. This discrimination cannot be justified -- even if one cannot definitively establish a racial motivation for it -- and it should therefore be found unconstitutional.

That said, I wouldn't hold my breath for a favorable decision from this Supreme Court.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mzuri
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Mzuri

Post Number: 4960
Registered: 01-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 09:41 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


We have a very fair and reasonable panel of judges on the SC and I believe that once they consider this case law, there will be changes effected in sentencing laws.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chrishayden
AALBC .com Platinum Poster
Username: Chrishayden

Post Number: 4678
Registered: 03-2004

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, June 14, 2007 - 10:25 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Negroes ought to quit using the stuff. It ain't no good for you in any way.

Once Negroes stop using the stuff they will legalize it and you won't have to worry.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration

Advertise | Chat | Books | Fun Stuff | About AALBC.com | Authors | Getting on the AALBC | Reviews | Writer's Resources | Events | Send us Feedback | Privacy Policy | Sign up for our Email Newsletter | Buy Any Book (advanced book search)

Copyright © 1997-2008 AALBC.com - http://aalbc.com