    
Stephgirl
Regular Poster
Username: Stephgirl
Post Number: 48
Registered: 09-2005
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Friday, April 14, 2006 - 07:10 pm: | 
|
This is from my journal, Stephanie's Journal:
More Haterade from D. Yeagley
Here's an article from David Yeagley. Yes, David Yeagley. He said that the victim lied about the incident and that Duke U. was unfairly targeted. He claims to be an American Indian but I considered him a white supremacist at hear
Punished Before Trial
Racism at Duke
By David Yeagley
"It’s racism at Duke, all right. Racism against white students. Members of the Duke University Lacrosse team may have abused a black party girl, but, without any proof or trial, the Duke Lacrosse team was punished by the university, suspended from further games.. So terrified was the administration of being charged with "racism." The black female wins again. She is truly an ace in the field and in court.
Naturally, the name of the black girl has not been released. The reports say the woman is a divorced, 27-year-old 'mother' of two, attending North Carolina Central University. She is not a person of note, and is said to do exotic dancing as a side job to pick up extra cash.
The entire Duke Lacrosse team and the university have been severely maligned on all sides. The alleged incident occurred March 13, but as of Sunday, April 2, no charges have been filed against anyone. One report says 46 of the 47 members of the team were required to submit DNA for testing. (The black member of the team, of course, was exempted, since the accuser says she was attacked by white males.)
The story, as reported in the papers, indicates either profound social retardation on the part of the black 'dancer,' or else irrationality on the part of racist-oriented reporters.
There were two women involved, one apparently white (whose name also remains unrevealed), and the other black. Police got a call from the black woman who claimed she had been yelled at by some guy in the rented quasi-frat house of the Lacrosse team. She and her companion nevertheless went back to the house to 'dance,' expecting, they say, four or five college boys to be there. Idiotic mistake No. 1.
Then, she says, the two women were suddenly surrounded by 40 some boys, all coughing up racial epithets—presumably at the black woman. (Remember, she’s a 27-year-old-mother. Some of the team members are under twenty-one, else how could any of them have been charged with under-aged drinking?) The women then say they were so upset and frightened that they left the house.
Then, 'helplessly,' the two women went back! Idiotic mistake No. 2.
Some guy on the porch "coaxed" them back, after which time they claim the black woman was abused. So far, there are no witnesses. (So what happened to the other woman?)
Two weeks later, the team was suspended from games. The team captains say that the DNA testing will prove that all the members are innocent. This, of course, if true, will mean that it was either an easy set up for the women, or else the fervor of youthful hormones blinded everyone. In the heat of passion, well-ignited before the girls even showed up, there may have been some rough-housing. Of course, a 27-year-old mother of two certainly must have more sense than a drunken 19-year-old, no? However, our nameless victim showed less maturity than a six-year-old.
All the racial issues in this story are moot. This is a tale of stupidity on the part of two women, particularly the black woman.
Black advocates are trying to play the racist element to the hilt. Rayone Bland, a black divinity student at Duke, thinks it’s that superiority complex of the rich whites. "So being told 'No' for the first time, I mean, is mind-blowing for them," he observes.
So that black woman said, "No," eh? First, she's in a profession where she’s expected to do tricks for clients. Secondly, she's walking into a house full of young, drinking athletes, who happen to be white. Thirdly, she called the police and complained once; then she went back, but then left. And then she went back again! That’s a peculiar way of saying "No," seems to me. These racist black people just want a role model victim, with mistreatment wreaked upon the weakest of the weak: the black woman. All she has to do is cry, "rape by white male!" And she rules the world.
Weak? How about, Strong? as in strongest manipulator.
But she had to have the money. Right? Just has to feed those children, pay that tuition, and rent, and car payment, and books. She’s not on welfare, scholarship, assistance of any kind? Well, whatever she does receive may not cover her expenses. That’s quite possible.
But, exotic dancing—and then to cry "abuse?" This is pushing victimhood beyond reason. This is being a victim of poverty, but then a victim of being a victim.'"
Give Me A Break, David!
He's the same guy who went hysterical over Janet/Justin debacle two years ago. He said among other things:
"Jackson and Timberlake should therefore be charge with a mass felony, and immediately convicted, and fined, and sentenced to appropriate jail time. The penalty should be in accordance with the number of people affected. Now, is it only the people in the Houston stadium that saw it, or also all the people of the state of Texas, or all the people in the United States and in the world who saw it on TV? Well, this is clearly beyond calculation"
"
Around white societies, some "black" people apparently have doubts about their sexual desirability. They still feel unaccepted, and unwanted, so in the name of "equality," they're determined to assert their bodies as sexually desirable. They want to force themselves in everyone's face, like it or not.
That's what Janet Jackson's recent episode at the Super Bowl was all about. She broadcast her private body part in the most dramatic way, in the world's face. Moreover, it was a white man, Justin Timberlake, that played the partof desiring her "black" body. Therefore, the message was loud and clear. "See?! Everyone wants my body! Especially the white man! I just proved it!'"
He blamed Janet then. Now the recent rape victim is his target. Who's next on his hit list?
|
Email This Page